LLM Fuzz CI vs ScreenCI

A GitHub Action that lets a coding agent write adversarial inputs for your tests, and reports only the ones that fail. Hi HN!Most of the explanation is in the blog post, and the code lives there: https://github.com/tiime-software/llm-fuzz-ci/Happy to receive feedback, and to know how other people use agents to improve code security!

Tutorial videos of your app, made by your coding agent. Describe the feature in one sentence and paste one prompt into Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor. It records a narrated walkthrough of your real app on your own machine, and the finished video opens in your browser, ready for your help center or docs, where anyone edits the narration, voices, and 79 languages. Engineers can keep the videos in the repository as Playwright tests that CI re-records on every release. Hi HN, I'm Olli. My friend Patrik and I are bootstrapping ScreenCI: tutorial videos of your web app that you can re-record in your CI on every release. If the video is out of date, the run fails like any E2E test.I've been on teams where the tutorial videos were outdated, or even where we held back UI improvements due to manually maintained videos. That's why we built system where you can describe the videos as Playwright E2E test code. Coding agents are very good with writing tests and you can run these scripts against your app on your machine. ScreenCI converts them into narra...